Kit-Bin
Donate

Drop WebP images here or click to browse

Processed entirely in your browser. Never uploaded to a server.

PNG is usually the better output when you need broad compatibility, transparency, or sharp interface graphics preserved exactly. Converting a photograph from WebP to PNG may make the file substantially larger without improving its visible quality. PNG isn't "better," it's just more universally accepted and lossless.

FAQ

Does converting WebP to PNG keep transparency?
Yes. If the source WebP has an alpha channel, it decodes with that transparency intact and re-encodes into PNG the same way, since both formats support a full alpha channel. If the WebP had no transparency to begin with, there is nothing to preserve, but that is a property of the source file, not a limitation of this conversion.
Does this lose quality?
No, PNG is lossless, so the pixel data is preserved exactly. The output file will typically be larger than the WebP source, since PNG doesn't compress as efficiently.
Why would I convert to PNG instead of keeping WebP?
PNG is broadly compatible with older software, image editors, and any application that doesn't accept WebP. Some design tools and older CMS platforms still reject .webp uploads outright.
Does this support animated WebP?
No, only the first frame of an animated WebP is converted, since PNG doesn't support animation. If you need to keep the animation, keep the file as WebP or convert to GIF instead.

Not sure which format you actually need? Read the comparison

Wondering how transparency survives the conversion? Read what transparent PNG actually means.

PNG output too big? Try Compress Image afterward, or read why WebP to PNG makes files bigger.